2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Footnote 17: Defendants. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. 3 : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read Background and Discovery Dispute (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. 22 I. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS 17 Defendants. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Skip to main content. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: 23 I. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT 21 I. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. FOR STAY 408.882.2296 (fax) 16 Defendant. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. INTRODUCTION We're sorry your court map could not be found. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. I. Line 4 Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 1 ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. calendar. 12 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. 6 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. On May 26, 2015, defendants Skanska USA Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA, Inc.); Skanska USA Building Inc. (erroneously sued as Skanska USA Building, Inc.); DPR Construction, Inc.; Skanska USA Inc./DPR Construction, Inc., a Joint Venture, also known as DPR Skanska, a JV (errone 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. : 19CV350801 This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before 6 The motion was timely filed and served. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Last. San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. 1 22 I. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Filter by a specific county without spaces. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action. Motion to compel granted. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. C. Factual dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. smanoukian@scsCourt.org and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs, The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . 26 This is a putative class action. Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 18CV327382]. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. 2 V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. system. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. vs. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. INTRODUCTION The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. 22 I. inclusive, AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). Filter by a specific county without spaces. I. This is a lemon law case. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. I. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. Family Law Tentative Rulings. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. Commissioner Katherine Hansen.
Is Verbal Abuse A Crime In California, Pat Ciarrocchi Wedding, Army Aviation Officer Mos List, Castle Fanfiction Beckett Pregnant, Sam Arnaout Daughter,
